(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA055331110; Thu, 11 May 1995 23:45:10 -0700
Return-Path: <owner-lightwave@webcom.com>
Received: from nova.unix.portal.com by webcom.com with ESMTP
(1.37.109.15/16.2) id AA055231106; Thu, 11 May 1995 23:45:06 -0700
Received: from hobo.online.portal.com (hobo.online.portal.com [156.151.5.5]) by nova.unix.portal.com (8.6.11/8.6.5) with ESMTP id XAA12717 for <lightwave@webcom.com>; Thu, 11 May 1995 23:47:09 -0700
From: Jeric@cup.portal.com
Received: (pccop@localhost) by hobo.online.portal.com (8.6.10/8.6.5) id XAA06690 for lightwave@webcom.com; Thu, 11 May 1995 23:47:08 -0700
To: lightwave@webcom.com
Subject: Re: NT ImageProcessing
Lines: 24
Date: Thu, 11 May 95 23:47:07 PDT
Message-Id: <9505112347.1.6590@cup.portal.com>
X-Origin: The Portal System (TM)
Sender: owner-lightwave@webcom.com
Precedence: bulk
>There is of course, Adobe PhotoShop for Windows. I've used the Mac version
>and it's great so I would assume the Windows version would be almost as
>good.
>
>-Carl
BZZZTTT! Carl, while PS is certainly a heavyweight package, in
this context (animation) it is sorely lacking, specifically in
that, to my knowledge, it has zero builtin batch capability.
There are supposed to be some (at least one) 3rd party batch thingy,
but this seems a curious shortcoming to moi.
After Effects is an animation compositing package that is very
powerful (this is what I was talking about, no?) and is almost
everything we've all dreamed of. Same company too.